1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1975 Mercedes-Benz 240
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mercedes-Benz 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mercedes-Benz 240 would be higher. At 2,402 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Mercedes-Benz 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1975 Mercedes-Benz 240. (63 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1975 Mercedes-Benz 240.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1975 Mercedes-Benz 240 | |
| Make | Caterham | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 1700 | 240 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2402 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 21.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 138 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 65 L |
