1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1978 Volvo 260
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 260. (146 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 260.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1978 Volvo 260 | |
| Make | Caterham | Volvo |
| Model | 1700 | 260 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 60 L |
