1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1978 ZIL 4104
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,695 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 ZIL 4104 (311 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 ZIL 4104 has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 ZIL 4104 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1978 ZIL 4104 | |
| Make | Caterham | ZIL |
| Model | 1700 | 4104 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 7695 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2090 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3340 mm |
