1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1979 Mazda 121
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mazda 121 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1979 Mazda 121. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda 121.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 1979 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Caterham | Mazda |
Model | 1700 | 121 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2520 mm |