1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho | |
| Make | Caterham | Matra-Simca |
| Model | 1700 | Rancho |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 145 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 60 L |
