1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1980 Saab 900
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Saab 900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Saab 900 would be higher. At 1,985 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Saab 900 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1980 Saab 900. (108 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1980 Saab 900.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Saab 900, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1980 Saab 900 | |
| Make | Caterham | Saab |
| Model | 1700 | 900 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2530 mm |
