1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1980 Volkswagen Scirocco
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volkswagen Scirocco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volkswagen Scirocco would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Volkswagen Scirocco, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1980 Volkswagen Scirocco | |
| Make | Caterham | Volkswagen |
| Model | 1700 | Scirocco |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1272 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2410 mm |
