1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1981 Zastava 132
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 132.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1981 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Caterham | Zastava |
| Model | 1700 | 132 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2560 mm |
