1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1982 Chrysler E | |
| Make | Caterham | Chrysler |
| Model | 1700 | E |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2630 mm |
