1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1982 Honda Ballade
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Honda Ballade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Honda Ballade would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1982 Honda Ballade. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1982 Honda Ballade.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Honda Ballade, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Honda Ballade has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Honda Ballade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 1982 Honda Ballade | |
Make | Caterham | Honda |
Model | 1700 | Ballade |
Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1335 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 67 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2330 mm |