1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1982 Renault Siete
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault Siete. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault Siete would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1982 Renault Siete. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault Siete.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1982 Renault Siete | |
| Make | Caterham | Renault |
| Model | 1700 | Siete |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2540 mm |
