1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Caterham | Fiat |
| Model | 1700 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1714 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2460 mm |
