1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1988 Alfa Romeo 164
To start off, 1988 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1988 Alfa Romeo 164. (123 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1988 Alfa Romeo 164.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 1988 Alfa Romeo 164 | |
Make | Caterham | Alfa Romeo |
Model | 1700 | 164 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 22.0:1 |
Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 202 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 70 L |