1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1995 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1995 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 1995 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | 1700 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1986 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2880 mm |