1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 1998 Acura CL is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1998 Acura CL. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura CL.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Acura CL has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Acura CL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1998 Acura CL | |
| Make | Caterham | Acura |
| Model | 1700 | CL |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 150 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2715 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 65 L |
