1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1999 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Caterham | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1700 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 5665 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 68 L |
