1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1999 Renault Safrane
To start off, 1999 Renault Safrane is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Renault Safrane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Safrane (191 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Safrane should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Safrane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Renault Safrane has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Safrane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 1999 Renault Safrane | |
Make | Caterham | Renault |
Model | 1700 | Safrane |
Year Released | 1986 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 191 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2770 mm |