1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1999 Toyota MR2
To start off, 1999 Toyota MR2 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1999 Toyota MR2. (140 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1999 Toyota MR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 1999 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Caterham | Toyota |
Model | 1700 | MR2 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 48 L |