1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2000 Honda Integra
To start off, 2000 Honda Integra is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda Integra (197 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2000 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Caterham | Honda |
| Model | 1700 | Integra |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 197 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2570 mm |
