1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2000 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XK is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2000 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Caterham | Jaguar |
| Model | 1700 | XK |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 3996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 290 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.7:1 |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 246 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 75 L |
