1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2001 Ford Ka
To start off, 2001 Ford Ka is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2001 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Ka.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2001 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Caterham | Ford |
| Model | 1700 | Ka |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 40 L |
