1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2001 Honda Civic
To start off, 2001 Honda Civic is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2001 Honda Civic. (127 HP @ 7600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2001 Honda Civic.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2001 Honda Civic | |
| Make | Caterham | Honda |
| Model | 1700 | Civic |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 235 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 50 L |
