1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
| Make | Caterham | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1700 | TrailBlazer |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 4157 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 71 L |
