1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2002 Ferrari 456M

To start off, 2002 Ferrari 456M is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 5,499 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Ferrari 456M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ferrari 456M (400 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ferrari 456M should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Caterham 1700 2002 Ferrari 456M
Make Caterham Ferrari
Model 1700 456M
Year Released 1986 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1692 cc 5499 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 12 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 168 HP 400 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 7250 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 3390 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1590 mm 1930 mm
Vehicle Height 1050 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 2260 mm 2660 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 36 L 110 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]