1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2002 McLaren F1
To start off, 2002 McLaren F1 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 6,063 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 McLaren F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 McLaren F1 (618 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 450 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 McLaren F1 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2002 McLaren F1 | |
| Make | Caterham | McLaren |
| Model | 1700 | F1 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 6063 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 618 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2720 mm |
