1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (266 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Caterham | Jeep |
| Model | 1700 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 4701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 266 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |
