1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2003 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 2003 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Volkswagen Passat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2003 Volkswagen Passat. (161 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2003 Volkswagen Passat.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volkswagen Passat, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2003 Volkswagen Passat | |
Make | Caterham | Volkswagen |
Model | 1700 | Passat |
Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 18.5:1 |
Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 225 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 62 L |