1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2004 Ford Excursion
To start off, 2004 Ford Excursion is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Ford Excursion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Excursion (310 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Excursion should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2004 Ford Excursion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Excursion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2004 Ford Excursion | |
| Make | Caterham | Ford |
| Model | 1700 | Excursion |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 6801 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 310 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 2050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 167 L |
