1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2004 Honda S2000
To start off, 2004 Honda S2000 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,147 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Honda S2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda S2000 (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda S2000 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2004 Honda S2000 | |
Make | Caterham | Honda |
Model | 1700 | S2000 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 50 L |