1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2004 Seat Leon
To start off, 2004 Seat Leon is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2004 Seat Leon. (104 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2004 Seat Leon.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Seat Leon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2004 Seat Leon | |
| Make | Caterham | Seat |
| Model | 1700 | Leon |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 192 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 55 L |
