1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2004 Volvo V70
To start off, 2004 Volvo V70 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,520 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo V70 (208 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2004 Volvo V70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Volvo V70 has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Volvo V70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2004 Volvo V70 | |
| Make | Caterham | Volvo |
| Model | 1700 | V70 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2520 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 80 L |
