1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (173 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2005 Chevrolet Colorado | |
| Make | Caterham | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1700 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2770 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 76 L |
