1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2005 Daewoo Rexton
To start off, 2005 Daewoo Rexton is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Daewoo Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Daewoo Rexton (215 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Rexton should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2005 Daewoo Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2005 Daewoo Rexton | |
Make | Caterham | Daewoo |
Model | 1700 | Rexton |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2830 mm |