1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2005 Ford Excursion
To start off, 2005 Ford Excursion is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 5,948 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Excursion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Excursion (325 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Excursion should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2005 Ford Excursion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Excursion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Ford Excursion has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Excursion will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2005 Ford Excursion | |
| Make | Caterham | Ford |
| Model | 1700 | Excursion |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 5948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 325 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 167 L |
