1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2005 Lada 2123
To start off, 2005 Lada 2123 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2005 Lada 2123. (76 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2005 Lada 2123.
Because 2005 Lada 2123 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lada 2123 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2005 Lada 2123 | |
| Make | Caterham | Lada |
| Model | 1700 | 2123 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2460 mm |
