1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2005 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2005 Mazda AZ is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2005 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Caterham | Mazda |
Model | 1700 | AZ |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2370 mm |