1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,220 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz S (201 HP @ 1800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Mercedes-Benz S has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mercedes-Benz S will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2005 Mercedes-Benz S | |
| Make | Caterham | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 1700 | S |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 3220 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 235 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 88 L |
