1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,945 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Caterham | Renault |
| Model | 1700 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2945 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.4:1 |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 245 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2590 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 61 L |
