1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2005 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2005 Subaru Outback is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,458 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Subaru Outback (250 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2005 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2005 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Caterham | Subaru |
| Model | 1700 | Outback |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2458 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 64 L |
