1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2005 Toyota Previa
To start off, 2005 Toyota Previa is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,362 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Previa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Previa. (161 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Previa.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Previa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2005 Toyota Previa | |
Make | Caterham | Toyota |
Model | 1700 | Previa |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2362 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 75 L |