1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2006 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2006 Dodge Durango is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Durango (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2006 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2006 Dodge Durango | |
| Make | Caterham | Dodge |
| Model | 1700 | Durango |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 4703 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 102 L |
