1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2006 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,197 cc, 2006 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2006 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Caterham | Fiat |
Model | 1700 | Croma |
Year Released | 1986 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2197 cc |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 145 HP |
Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 62 L |