1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2006 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2006 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2006 Nissan X-Trail. (112 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan X-Trail.
Because 2006 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2006 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Caterham | Nissan |
| Model | 1700 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 16.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 60 L |
