1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2006 Panoz Esperante
To start off, 2006 Panoz Esperante is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Panoz Esperante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Panoz Esperante (305 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Panoz Esperante should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2006 Panoz Esperante | |
| Make | Caterham | Panoz |
| Model | 1700 | Esperante |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 4589 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 59 L |
