1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2007 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2007 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2007 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | 1700 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1986 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 4016 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 84 L |