1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe (333 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
| Make | Caterham | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1700 | Tahoe |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 5999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 333 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 9 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 98 L |
