1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2008 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2008 Kia Sedona is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2008 Kia Sedona | |
| Make | Caterham | Kia |
| Model | 1700 | Sedona |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 177 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 75 L |
