1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (204 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Caterham | Jaguar |
| Model | 1700 | XF |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2720 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 229 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 70 L |
