1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,777 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Jeep Wrangler has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Wrangler will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2009 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Caterham | Jeep |
| Model | 1700 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 3777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 85 L |
