1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2010 Audi Q7
To start off, 2010 Audi Q7 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi Q7 (280 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2010 Audi Q7 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Audi Q7 has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Audi Q7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2010 Audi Q7 | |
Make | Caterham | Audi |
Model | 1700 | Q7 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5088 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1737 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3002 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 100 L |